What type of improper conduct is Sascha guilty of when she informs a buyer about her seller client's flexibility on price?

Sascha's actions of informing a buyer about her seller client's flexibility on price can be seen as a failure to satisfy fiduciary duties. In a real estate relationship, an agent has a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of their client, which in this case is the seller.

By divulging information about the seller's willingness to negotiate on price without the seller's consent, Sascha has potentially compromised her client's negotiating position and interests. This not only undermines the trust that is fundamental to the fiduciary relationship but could also adversely affect the seller’s ability to achieve the best price for their property. Maintaining confidentiality and safeguarding the client’s interests in negotiations is a critical aspect of fiduciary duty, and this conduct falls short of those expectations.

This behavior illustrates a key principle in real estate practice: agents must be prudent and cautious with information, particularly when it relates to pricing strategies or other sensitive negotiations, to fulfill their obligations to clients effectively.